arrow-circle arrow-long-stroke arrow-stroke arrow-thick arrow-thin arrow-triangle icon 2 baseballCreated with Sketch. basketball calendar category check-circle check-square check comment facebook-circle facebook-icon facebook-rounded facebook-square facebook-stroke football instagram-circle instagram-icon instagram-square long-arrow-right rss-circle rss-rounded rss-square rss-stroke rss twitter-circle twitter-icon twitter-rounded twitter-square twitter-stroke user-group user

Tigers Thrash Missouri! (Grading Auburn’s 51–14 win over Missouri)

By on September 24th, 2017 in Football 13 Comments »

Kerryon Johnson soars back into action
(L.G. Patterson, The Associated Press)

     War Eagle everybody! It’s time now for the Acid Reign Report on Auburn’s first road win of the year, a 51–14 shelling of the Missouri Tigers. For the most part, Auburn was clicking in all 3 phases of the game, and Missouri was pretty much dead and buried well before halftime. This game was a far cry from a week ago when Auburn struggled to get any push against Mercer and committed 5 turnovers. The offense came alive and attacked one-on-one matchups. With better players, a lot of those plays went Auburn’s way.

     On the day, the offense generated 482 yards of total offense, but the last quarter was played with mostly backups on the field. Auburn converted 7 of 15 third-down conversions and had no turnovers, while Missouri had 4. That allowed Auburn to build a big time-of-possession advantage, keeping the ball for over 34 minutes.    

     We knew going in that Missouri was suspect on defense, but I was wary of the front four. Auburn’s offensive line made a pretty big jump this week and had some nasty blocking. Even better was the pass protection. Jarrett Stidham was hardly pressured at all, and if a defense can’t move Stidham’s feet, it will get picked apart.

     If there is any area of concern on offense after this one, it would be on the running game. Both of Auburn’s top runners are hobbled with injuries. This week, Kerryon Johnson played at maybe 80 percent, and Kamryn Pettway took the week off. Auburn finished with 263 rushing yards, but Johnson only had 48 yards on the day. The blazing speed of Kam Martin and Eli Stove accounted for half the yardage on only 12 carries. If I had my way, we’d see more of Martin out there. He’s a threat to take it to the house on every carry.

     Statistically, this game will appear that Auburn took a few steps backward defensively, but these things can be explained by the blowout. Auburn held two banged up starters out, and was subbing liberally even in the 2nd quarter. A lot of Missouri’s yards came in garbage time with the game way out of hand. The starting defense regularly put the Mizzou offense in a bind and clamped down on 3rd down.

     Missouri was its own worst enemy at times. There were 3 false starts in the 1st quarter alone. Auburn had an interception that went through a Missouri receiver’s hands. And then, there was the crazy fumble play that wasn’t blown dead. Me, I thought the quarterback’s arm was going forward, and replay seemed to confirm it. It should have been ruled an incomplete pass. I’d have been howling about the refs if it had happened to Auburn! Missouri defenders had trouble getting off blocks and trouble getting a handle on Auburn ball carriers.

     Auburn had a better special teams day this week. Punting is still a bit concerning. We are seeing short punts that, so far, have hit and rolled. The average ends up around 40 yards, but those things are ugly to watch. If that keeps happening, we will see a knuckler NOT roll when we need it most in a big game. Daniel Carlson looked like he was finally back to last year’s form with very strong and accurate kicks.

Unit grades after the jump!

Defensive Line: A-. I felt like the line, particularly the starters did a great job of swallowing up blockers and disrupting up front. It seemed like Drew Lock was being harrassed every pass play, and runs up the middle didn’t get far. Strangely, Auburn only got credit for 1 quarterback hurry by Jeffery Holland. I guess the home-team statistician was taking a nap instead of watching the game. The Auburn line was credited with 1 sack, 3 tackles for loss, and 10 total tackles.

Linebackers: A-. The Auburn linebackers continue to do a good job of filling lanes and hunting the football down, even with starting middle linebacker Tré Williams sitting this one out. Montavious Atkinson and Richard McBryde filled in admirably, and the unit soldiered on. Linebackers were credited with 16 tackles.

Secondary: A-. Most of what I counted off on was second- and third-team defenders getting beat deep. Fortunately, Missouri was unable to make good throws in those situations. The starting defenders played really well and took home run threat J’Mon Moore away. Moore had just 2 catches on the day with a late touchdown against the reserves. Moore was matched up mostly on Carlton Davis, and Davis decisively won that battle. I also enjoyed the play of Jeremiah Dinson, Tray Matthews and Stephen Roberts. Those are all guys that cover a lot of ground and lay the wood when they get there. Auburn’s secondary contributed 28 total tackles. Missouri put the ball in the air a lot in this game, and Auburn limited the Tigers to just 5.5 yards per pass with most of the yardage coming against the reserves.

Punting: C. Ian Shannon punted 3 times for just 39.3 yards per attempt, and frankly was the beneficiary of some lucky rolls. On the plus side, there were no returns, and one was killed inside the 20-yard line.

Punt Returns: B+. Missouri punted 6 times, and there was one fair catch and one return for one yard by Stephen Roberts. That doesn’t sound like much. However, most of these punts were backspinners landing inside the 10 yard line. Getting away from them is the smart thing for the return man to do. The Roberts fair catch at the 10 was good, too. That ball likely would have rolled down near the goal line. We won’t see another punter that good till we face Bama’s J. K. Scott.

Kick Returns: B-. Missouri was another team that did not want to kick to Auburn return men. Noah Igbinoghene brought one out late for 21 yards, which is pretty average.

Place Kicking: A+. Daniel Carlson was 3 for 3 on field goal attempts, and 2 of them were beyond 50 yards. That gives Carlson 12 career field goals of that distance or more. Carlson was also a busy man kicking off, notching 9 touchbacks on 10 kickoffs. We’ve seen Carlson consistently reach the end zone this year, but a lot of kickoffs this day were actually boomed beyond the back of the end zone. It was quite impressive!

Offensive Line: A-. I still would like to see a bit more push in the run game, but I think Missouri has a decent defensive line, and Auburn held its own. Pass protection issues seem to have been greatly reduced if not eliminated. Jarrett Stidham wasn’t sacked or even close to being sacked. This was the second appearance of Auburn’s shuffled offensive line, and I’m scratching my head. Due to an injury to Darius James last week, center Austin Golson moved out to right tackle, and senior Jax State transfer Casey Dunn took over at center. Early last season, we saw Golson struggle at left tackle before being moved back to center. This year, on the right side, Golson looked surprisingly good. Missouri continually tried to beat him around the corner and could not do it. Prince Tega Wanagho has steadily improved, also, and looked good on the other side. I got a kick out of the Auburn participation report. It lists Chase Ritter (a walk-on linebacker) as the starting center! I’m sure he enjoyed his moment in the spotlight…

Running Backs: A. Some might question this grade with Kerryon Johnson only getting 48 yards, but it’s kind of hard to pile up big yardage numbers when most of the carries are inside the 10-yard line! Blocking was good, especially by the H-backs. The reason all those wildcat plays worked so well was that Auburn went with 2 H-backs, Chandler Cox and Spencer Nigh, and they walled their men off consistently. Despite Missouri being stacked to stop the run, Auburn averaged 5 yards per carry, put no balls on the ground, dropped no passes, and did not turn any pass rushers loose till well into garbage time.

Receivers: B. We saw a vast improvement this week. I feel like there were a few route-running errors this week, and another glaring dropped ball by Sal Cannella. However, Auburn’s men blocked OK, got open and caught the ball. Where the blocking was not great was on outside screens, with the Missouri corner consistently getting into the passing lane. That forced the QB to pull the ball back in and run too many times. For those RPOs to work, blocking HAS to get better. Auburn got called for holding on the outside twice, which negated big pass plays.

Quarterback: A. Some might question this grade as Stidham really did have all day to throw. I only saw maybe 2 out of 17 passes that were off target, and nothing was even close to a turnover. Stidham is on fire, efficiency-wise, hitting 13 of 17 passes for 218 yards. That’s a gaudy 12.8 yards per pass average! Malik Willis got in the game late, hitting 3 of 4 passes for no yards. The coaches had Willis throwing receiver screens to reserve receivers against Missouri starters.

     It was a fun road trip for Auburn football. Auburn went to a hostile place and beat the snot out of the home team, which is what was needed. Maybe there is little value in smoking a team that is clearly in disarray, but I was encouraged by Auburn’s improved execution. Like it or not, Coach Malzhan’s teams tend to take a few games to start firing on all cylinders.

     I also have to hand it to the Auburn offensive coaches regarding the Wildcat plays. I’ve been one of the biggest critics, saying that the plays were a waste of a down and way too predictable. This game, there were some pretty creative new wrinkles. I particularly liked the use of Spencer Nigh on “wham” blocks. Auburn would let a defender through, pull the guard, and Nigh would come back to the middle and blindside obliterate any defender that came through. This did fail on one play, but Johnson shook off the tackler and scored anyway. I also loved the fake pitch to Stidham in motion. Later down the road, that play might result in a turned-loose tight end wide open in the end zone with the ball in Stidham’s hands.

     Auburn returns home for the next couple of weeks, hosting first Mississippi State then Ole Miss. In front of a partisan crowd, this is a great opportunity for more improvement and live competition against SEC-level talent. Mississippi State should come into this game angry. They looked like world-beaters against LSU only to lay an egg yesterday against Georgia. If Mississippi State is to have any hope at winning the division this year, they have to beat Auburn. I would expect nothing less than its best effort.


  1. ATL_AU_FAN ATL_AU_FAN says:

    The environment was not as hostile as I expected. The Mizzou fans with whom I spoke and interacted were not expecting a whole lot. Yeah, they were obviously hoping for better things and were loud at the start but two quick TD’s and the Auburn contingent was much louder and it stayed that way until the end. Even the two scores by Mizzou did very little for those home crowd fans that were still around.
    But, had a great time, made it back to the ATL around 3:30, and looking forward to packing on Friday for a home game with Clanga.

    It’s Great to be an Auburn Tiger and, as always…


  2. Acid Reign Acid Reign says:

    …..It should be a much shorter drive, to be sure!

  3. sparkey sparkey says:

    One game against a pitiful team doesn’t impress me. Sorry, they are pitiful. Not a big deal.

    • ATL_AU_FAN ATL_AU_FAN says:

      C'mon Sparkey — Settle down a bit and let's see what happens… If AU totally craps out against "good" competition then we can maybe go with your opinion. But, as it is right now, I have to think it was great to see the AU defense do what it does and, for the offense, a chance to see what "could" be the signs of what is to come.
      Sure, this game was against a lesser SEC team but AU did exactly what good teams do and that is to take care of lesser competition and not play down the their level. This game was basically over in the first quarter – as it should have been.

    • Acid Reign Acid Reign says:

      …..I have to look at what was terrible a month ago, and what is better executed, now. Progress is progress.

  4. dyingculture dyingculture says:

    I give the receivers an A, mostly because on those 3 deep balls, either Sammie Coates or Ricardo Louis definitely would have dropped at least one of those, maybe two.

    • War_Eagle_2010 War_Eagle_2010 says:

      Haha, ^this.

    • audad says:

      Being a Browns fan, I watched their game yesterday and Ricardo dropped three passes that were in his hands. I believe the Browns dropped 8 total. I was also at the game in Columbia Saturday. Yes, the competition wasn’t great, but the team played pretty well in all phases of the game, and any time you have more of your own fans left in an SEC stadium than the home team does in the 4th qtr, then it’s been a good night for your team.

  5. mvhcpa says:

    You know, we did the exact same thing to Arkansas last year, and we were convinced that AU had it together FINALLY to challenge for the West title. Then, things started to go downhill with Ole Miss and Vanderbilt, even with wins. We know what happened after that.

    My question is, how bad did Arkie stink last year? If Mizzou this year is as bad or worse than the piggies last year, then there isn’t much prognosticative value to this particular butt-stomping, and nothing more to feel good about other than (as Acid said above) the great execution and the definitive improvement.

    Michael Val
    (who just wants to see some competent, hard-playing football every week from out Men in Blue without a bunch of drama off the field)

  6. multipurposepaper says:

    Paraphrasing Billy Beane (as played by Brad Pitt). There’s good teams, there’s bad teams, there’s 50 feet of crap, then there is Mizzou.

    However, we did to them what we are supposed to do to bad teams and the game was over by the middle of the 3rd quarter, if not sooner (oh, hi Tennessee). So that’s progress.

    The running game is still not where it needs to be for the meat of the schedule but if this offense can learn more about what it can and can’t do well, that should lead to better production. We’ll see if Gus and Chip can keep making good adjustments, get something going with the RBs where we don’t ground one into dust each week and use Stidham’s athleticism.

  7. almightytmc says:

    I think given the performances the grades are spot on. But, Mizzou is (without a doubt) one of the worst teams in the nation. If they win 3 more games this year i will be stunned) So the barometer is skewed about how that performance measures against msu. (Whom I think could have done the same beating on Mizzou.)