arrow-circle arrow-long-stroke arrow-stroke arrow-thick arrow-thin arrow-triangle icon 2 baseballCreated with Sketch. basketball calendar category check-circle check-square check comment facebook-circle facebook-icon facebook-rounded facebook-square facebook-stroke football instagram-circle instagram-icon instagram-square long-arrow-right rss-circle rss-rounded rss-square rss-stroke rss twitter-circle twitter-icon twitter-rounded twitter-square twitter-stroke user-group user

If Malzahn Were a Gambler

By on September 12th, 2017 in Football 16 Comments »

Auburn head coach Gus Malzahn talks to quarterback Jarrett Stidham during the first half of Clemson game Sept. 9, 2017 (Julie Bennett/

There have been hundreds of movies portraying the volatility of gambling. The topic has been covered from every angle imaginable, from being the bookie, to being the house, to being the long shot that wins big, to being the down-on-the-luck loser and everything in between. Which got me thinking …

If Gus Malzahn were a gambler, what kind of gambler would he be? 

What fans witnessed from Gus Malzahn Saturday night was something out of a gambling movie, and it permeates a whole game, a whole season, and a whole career at Auburn. Malzahn is the down-on-his-luck gambler who just can’t get the dice to roll as he wants them to. But instead of walking away from the table and making adjustments, Gus Malzahn is going to do the same thing, regardless of previous result. It’s all on black. And when that loses, it has to be black the next time because it wasn’t the time before. And when that loses, it has to be be black because it wasn’t black the time before or the time before that. 

It’s getting late in the third quarter, and Auburn needs to move the chains. Malzahn checks his play sheet and sends in the play. Stidham drops back to pass. He holds the ball. Pats it. Checks it down to a pass three yards short of the chains to Will Hastings, but Hastings can’t come up with it. Now it’s third and ten. Stidham drops back and throws the exact same pass to Ryan Davis, again, three yards short of the sticks. 4th and three, Auburn goes for it, but the D-line reads the snap count perfectly, explodes upfield and Stidham is sacked for a 14-yard loss, the 11th of the game. It’s the same situation and same result seen all game. 

This play is the microcosm of the drive, of the game, of the season, of the career of Malzahn. But isn’t Auburn supposed to push the ball down the field this year? Isn’t Chip Lindsey calling plays? Isn’t Stidham the best quarterback Malzahn has had? Despite changing quarterbacks, offensive coordinators, and, supposedly, his role in the offense, the result against Clemson was the same as last year. The result against a Top Ten opponent is the same as it’s been the previous five tries. 0–6. It continues a trend that began in 2013: a regressing offense from a supposed offensive genius. 

Auburn‘s incredible defense kept Malzahn in the game for the second straight time against Clemson, despite his being a supposed offensive genius. Fans kept thinking, the Auburn offense just needed to make a small change. A rub route. A slant. A perimeter run with Kam Martin. A change to Malik Willis. Anything other than what Malzahn kept doing. 

Despite the need for change from the in-game play calling, in the offensive personnel, in the offensive identity, Malzahn doggedly does what Malzahn thinks will work, even if it doesn’t work anymore and hasn’t worked in some time. This is the third time in the last six games that Auburn has produced fewer than 200 total yards, and the seventh time in the last 15 games that Auburn has produced fewer than 20 points.

This time, though. This time it will be different. This time the buck sweep on first down will work. This time the receivers will outrun the corners and get open. This time the defense will be confused on 3rd and goal from the two-yard line when Chandler Cox lines up as quarterback. After it all, Malzahn sits in the press conference and wonders why it didn’t work, once again, and he offers the same excuse he offered before, hoping the fans hear him. 

So, who would Malzahn be if he were a movie gambler? He is the once-successful gambler standing at the wheel, who has squandered away all his winnings instead of investing wisely. Day after day, he is ready to throw his last dime on black, even though black hasn’t turned up all night or the night before or the night before that. Each night, when the money is gone, he thinks about missed opportunities and what he should have done differently instead of the obvious solution: quit doing what you did last night and the night before.  

At what point does Gus realize he has a legitimate problem? More importantly, when will he run out of cachet with his bosses and his fans?


  1. KungFuPanda9 KungFuPanda9 says:

    Interesting observation, Zach.

    It is astounding that the high level of athletes Auburn has recruited does not reflect the same level of play on the field. This is clearly a coaching problem.

    The defense is playing at such a superior level compared to the offense. And which side of the ball is Malzahn involved with most compared to least. The variables can be reduced to make an obvious conclusion.

    My biggest concern is the play-calling. There are so many repeated plays/position roles that opposing defensive coordinators have been able to compile reliable information with which to counter Malzahn’s playbook. Auburn’s offense has become predictable.

    When you see two defenders trailing one deep receiver, that means somebody else is not being covered. Why has the defense decided to ignore somebody? They are playing the odds.

  2. easyedwin easyedwin says:

    One more sack and my eyes will pop out.
    Quick slant! The Steelers run it all the time and AB catches it all the time.
    The gamble was with Stidham. He has a lot to learn. He does not have the wheels that Kelly has. I must state that Sean White [at this point in time] is the better QB. Get him in vs Mercy and let him get back in the flow. His wheels are slightly better IMHO.

  3. ATL_AU_FAN ATL_AU_FAN says:

    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

    That sums it up.

    (And what is up with the page refresh on this site? Or is that only occurring to me?)

  4. uglyjoe says:

    Good article, bad analogy. At least with betting it all on black, the odds to win stay the same from spin to spin.

  5. Tigerstripe Tigerstripe says:

    Russian roulette with only one empty chamber.

  6. clm0001 clm0001 says:

    Can anyone speak to how well this coaching staff actually works together? Now that Borges is the “offensive analyst” will he have enough juice to make Gus look in the mirror and realize that he’s the offenses biggest problem?

  7. Orangeblood says:

    I just hate that Stidham took such a beating… Physically and Reputationally. Gus didnt bring in the blockers needed to protect him.
    And.., I think we could have lined up with two tightends and a full back and ran some smash mouth football for firstdowns.

  8. audad says:

    Outstanding column Zach. As the son of a bookie that was able to put his kids through college thanks to those many “customers” that kept coming back week after week and month after month and year after year, you absolutely hit the nail on the head.

  9. B-REAL says:

    Gus’s highschool day’s are still with him till times get hard.He plays favorites and makes promises to players until it’s obvious the other players are better, especially at QB and RB.We all no the two Johnson’s were his favorites in 15 but Barber and redshirt freshman White were better.Last year Pettway went off in the spring game and White played well.Guess who came out the first possession of last year’s Clemson game?The Johnson’s.Pettway and White were the obvious starters.5 star Stidham enters the picture and Gus obviously loves the guy.He was starting no matter if White looked better or not.The two best players on offense in 2016 are suspended the first game,one wasn’t playing anyway and the roster games continue.

  10. eyecu says:

    Gus a “genius” ? A genius continually learns and evolves. Offenses have to evolve as defensive coaches figure out how to defend them. I remember when Darrell Royal started running the wishbone at Texas, wasn’t long till most schools were running the wishbone. Now it is rare to see it, because defensive coaches figured out how to stop the bone. If Gus doesn’t make changes gonna be a long season, and have to start over next year I’m afraid.

  11. Orangeblood says:

    Well…. “Thats one game”
    Lets see how we the Tigers regroup. We remember what happen in 2013!

  12. Tiger4Life says:

    2013 was magical… We need consistent, reliable offensive output against the BIG BOYS…
    Can’t wait to see how Louisville’s offense does against the Clemson defense