arrow-circle arrow-long-stroke arrow-stroke arrow-thick arrow-thin arrow-triangle icon 2 baseballCreated with Sketch. basketball calendar category check-circle check-square check comment facebook-circle facebook-icon facebook-rounded facebook-square facebook-stroke football instagram-circle instagram-icon instagram-square long-arrow-right rss-circle rss-rounded rss-square rss-stroke rss twitter-circle twitter-icon twitter-rounded twitter-square twitter-stroke user-group user

Change on the Horizon for SEC as Part of NCAA Super Division

                                      SEC Commissioner Mike Slive (photo:Marvin Gentry,USAToday)

The spring meetings of the South Eastern Conference got underway yesterday in Destin, Florida. And for the first time in several years SEC scheduling is not the hot button issue. That decision was put to rest (at least for now) April 26th when the league voted to keep the 6-1-1 model.

However, there are several important issues to be considered this week by the presidents, athletic directors, and head coaches from the revenue producing sports of football and basketball.

On the agenda will be the discussion of programming for the new SEC Network and more importantly how the revenue sharing will be handled. In addition, AD’s and football coaches will consider the best way to respond to growing national interest in an early signing period.

It also looks like the issue of alcohol sales at SEC games will be on the table. However, Commissioner Slive said Tuesday that, “Discussion will be about neutral sites not covered by the SEC rule preventing on campus sales.”

And despite Bret Biliema’s denial yesterday, it’s a safe bet that talk will surface about his and Nick Saban’s proposal to force offenses to wait 10 seconds before snapping the ball to slow down the Hurry-Up-No-Huddle offense. After all Biliema has not missed an opportunity yet to push for a change in the game.

The most significant topic though, will be the so called “Autonomy” proposal under consideration by the NCAA.

Probably as a result of the Ed O’Bannon law suit and the Nortwestern NLRB decision the NCAA Board of Directors gave tacit approval last month to a proposal that would allow the five big conferences to come up with a plan to govern themselves.

Under the proposal the Big-5 conferences (SEC, Pac-12, Big10, ACC, and Big10) would still be under the NCAA umbrella but would have the authority to set their own rules.

Some of the things to be decided are:

* How much latitude in governing themselves will the Big-5 have? 
* Will this mean the larger Universities will be able to grant “full cost of attendance” scholarships?
* And if increased  financial aid is awarded student-athletes, will it be across the board to every sport or just football and basketball?
* Will a new subdivision affect more than the ability to provide student-athletes a financial stipend?
* Will there be separate rules governing the recruiting process?
* Will it result in easier transfer rules for football as in the other sports?

Those questions and more have to be hammered out before a new super subdivision can be created within the NCAA.

The league has to decide this week what position it will take on the various questions because the Division I Board of Directors meets the end of August to vote on the Big-5’s separating from the rest of Division I schools.

We wrote in this space a few weeks ago that the times are changing in college athletics. Jay Coulter’s Tuesday article about the possible removal of conference divisional play is just one example of those changes. And the mere chance that the NCAA would consider allowing 65 schools to basically write their own rules is proof of just how much change is on the horizon.

How do you feel about allowing the Big-5 Conferences to operate under a separate set of rules than the rest of the NCAA?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...


  1. KoolBell KoolBell says:

    “The only thing in our lives besides God’s love, that never changes, is that change is inevitable”

    I felt disheartened when the SEC announced it’s approval of the 6-1-1 scheduling. Then I remembered that the most drastic change was coming within the NCAA with the formation of the “Super 5” conferences.

    The college football landscape is in a shift of never before seen proportions. Now is the time that we should be very thankful that Mike Slive is the leader of our conference. The SEC can not stop the inevitable, but it can control how violently this all shakes out.

  2. hello2196 says:

    I believe this is something that is necessary. The smaller schools do not have the same needs as the larger universities and they don’t need to have the same rules. But is the “Super 5” the way to go?

    Will it be fair to other “large” schools? There are schools that are at that level but are not in the Super 5 conferences – teams like BYU, UConn, Houston, Notre Dame, Cincinnati, and Louisville to mention a few.

  3. WoodrowAU95 says:

    Sorry for the ignorance, but is Notre Dame joining a conference?

    If not, what effect would it have on the “Super 5”?

    Thanks for the info!!!


    • Acid Reign Acid Reign says:

      ……Notre Dame “kind of” joined the ACC, but not really, last season. They are sort of in that conference, but aren’t in a division, and don’t have to play anyone. Wiser lawyers than I will have to try to explain the details…